Juries Decide Questions Of Law10 min read

A jury is a group of people selected to hear a criminal or civil trial and render a verdict on the issues presented. The right to a trial by jury is enshrined in the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. The role of the jury is to decide the questions of law and fact in a case.

The jury is typically presented with a set of facts and asked to decide whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the charged offense. In a criminal trial, the jury also determines the appropriate sentence if the defendant is found guilty. In a civil trial, the jury decides the amount of money to be awarded to the plaintiff if the plaintiff is successful.

Juries are selected from the pool of registered voters in the jurisdiction in which the trial is taking place. The jurors are chosen at random from this pool. The jurors are questioned by the judge to determine whether they are qualified to serve on the jury.

The judge is responsible for instructing the jury on the law applicable to the case. The judge may also instruct the jury on the facts of the case. The jury is not bound by the instructions of the judge, but is free to reach its own conclusions based on the evidence presented at trial.

The verdict of a jury is final and cannot be appealed. The jury is also responsible for issuing a verdict on damages in a civil trial.

Who decided questions of the law?

Who decided questions of the law? The answer to this question is not as straightforward as one might think. The answer depends on what is meant by the term “law.” 

In the most general sense, law refers to a system of rules that are used to regulate the behavior of people in a society. These rules may be written or unwritten, and they may come from a variety of sources, including the government, religious organizations, or custom and tradition. 

The person or body who creates, interprets, and enforces the law is known as the legislator. In most democracies, the legislative power is vested in the parliament or congress, which is made up of elected representatives of the people. The parliament or congress is responsible for making the laws that govern the country. 

However, the parliament or congress is not the only body that can create law. In some countries, the executive branch of the government, which is headed by the president or prime minister, has the power to make laws. This power is known as the royal prerogative or executive privilege. 

Read also  Intellectual Property Law Requirements

The judiciary is also involved in making law. When a court interprets a law, it is essentially creating a new law. The court may also rule on the constitutionality of laws, which can have the effect of overturning or amending existing laws. 

So, who decides questions of the law? In a democracy, the people through their elected representatives in the parliament or congress. In a monarchy, the executive branch of the government. And in a constitutional monarchy or republic, the judiciary.

What do juries decide quizlet?

What do juries decide quizlet?

The purpose of a jury is to decide the facts of a case. A jury is a group of people who are selected to hear a case and decide the verdict. A jury is made up of regular citizens who have been randomly selected from a pool of people.

A jury is not supposed to decide the law. That is the job of the judge. The jury is only supposed to decide the facts of the case. The judge will tell the jury what the law is and then the jury will decide whether or not the defendant broke the law.

The jury is not supposed to consider the punishment that the defendant deserves. That is the job of the judge. The jury is only supposed to decide whether or not the defendant broke the law.

The jury is not supposed to consider the defendant’s innocence or guilt. That is the job of the judge. The jury is only supposed to decide whether or not the defendant broke the law.

The jury is not supposed to consider the motives of the defendant. That is the job of the judge. The jury is only supposed to decide whether or not the defendant broke the law.

The jury is not supposed to consider the financial damages that the plaintiff may have suffered. That is the job of the judge. The jury is only supposed to decide whether or not the defendant broke the law.

The jury is not supposed to consider whether the defendant is a good person or a bad person. That is the job of the judge. The jury is only supposed to decide whether or not the defendant broke the law.

What is considered a question of law?

In general, a question of law is a question that can be resolved by applying legal principles. For example, whether a particular contract is valid is a question of law. Questions of fact, on the other hand, cannot be resolved by applying legal principles and must be resolved by looking at the specific facts of the case.

There are a few key things to keep in mind when determining whether a question is a question of law. First, the question must be capable of resolution by applying legal principles. This means that the question must be based on a legal rule or principle, and the answer must be capable of being determined by looking at case law or statutes.

Read also  How To Make Money With A Law Degree

Second, the question must be important to the case. This means that the question must have a bearing on the outcome of the case. For example, a question of whether a particular witness is credible is generally not considered to be a question of law, since the credibility of a witness is generally a question of fact.

Third, the question must be decided by the court. This means that the question must be resolved by the judge or the jury. For example, a question of whether a party has complied with a contract is generally a question of fact that will be decided by the court.

Fourth, the question must be resolved in a single proceeding. This means that the question must be resolved at one point in time. For example, a question of whether a party is liable for a particular act is generally resolved in a single proceeding.

Finally, the question must be resolved by the court’s interpretation of the law. This means that the question must be answered by looking at the law as it is written. For example, a question of whether a particular contract is valid is resolved by looking at the law that governs contracts.

While there are some general principles that can be used to determine whether a question is a question of law, there is no single test that will always be applied. In the end, it is up to the court to decide what is considered a question of law.

Should jury be allowed to ask questions?

In the United States, the idea of a trial by jury is a cornerstone of the justice system. Juries are meant to be a check on the power of the government, and to provide a fair trial for defendants. However, one issue with juries is that they are often not allowed to ask questions. This can lead to problems, as jurors may not be able to fully understand the case if they are not allowed to ask questions.

There are a few reasons why judges often do not allow jurors to ask questions. First, judges may be worried that jurors will ask questions that are not relevant to the case. Second, judges may be worried that jurors will ask questions that will bias them against the defendant. Finally, judges may be worried that jurors will ask questions that will be difficult for the lawyers to answer.

Despite these concerns, there are a few reasons why jurors should be allowed to ask questions. First, jurors may not be able to understand the case if they are not allowed to ask questions. Second, jurors may not be able to make an informed decision if they are not allowed to ask questions. Finally, allowing jurors to ask questions can help to ensure that the trial is fair.

In the end, there is no easy answer as to whether or not jurors should be allowed to ask questions. However, there are a few reasons why it may be beneficial to allow them to do so.

Read also  Justice Class Action Lawsuit 2017

What is the difference between question of fact and question of law?

When it comes to the law, there is a big distinction between questions of fact and questions of law. A question of fact is a question that can be answered by looking at the facts of a situation. For example, “What is the color of the car?” is a question of fact. You can answer this question by looking at the car and determining its color.

A question of law, on the other hand, is a question that can be answered only by looking at the law. For example, “Can I park my car here?” is a question of law. The answer to this question depends on the law, not on the facts.

There are some questions that can be both questions of fact and questions of law. For example, “What is the value of the car?” is a question of fact, but it can also be a question of law if the value of the car is in dispute.

It is important to understand the difference between questions of fact and questions of law, because the answer to each type of question can be important in a legal case. If you are involved in a legal case, it is important to know which type of question is being asked.

What’s the difference between question of law and fact?

The distinction between a question of law and a question of fact is an important one in the law. A question of law is a question that can be answered by reference to the law, while a question of fact is a question that can only be answered by reference to the facts of a particular case.

One way to think about the distinction is to imagine that the law is a set of rules that govern how people should behave. A question of law would ask how a particular rule should be applied in a particular situation. For example, a question of law might ask whether a particular contract is valid. A question of fact, on the other hand, would ask what happened in a particular situation. For example, a question of fact might ask what the terms of a particular contract were.

Questions of law are resolved by courts, while questions of fact are resolved by juries. This is because the law is something that can be learned, while the facts of a case are something that must be determined by looking at the evidence.

What are 3 characteristics of a jury?

There are three general characteristics of a jury that are worth noting. First, a jury is typically composed of people who are randomly selected from the population. Second, a jury is typically impartial, meaning that they are not biased towards either the prosecution or the defense. Third, a jury is typically independent, meaning that they are not influenced by either the prosecution or the defense.